The debate is over: The MMR vaccine can cause Autism, and the...

The debate is over: The MMR vaccine can cause Autism, and the CDC is engaged in a criminal conspiracy to cover up this fact.

80885
52
SHARE

Dr. Buckkey can be reached via: http://kinseimindbody.com
For years, proponents of vaccines have claimed that there was no evidence showing a direct link between vaccines and autism, despite the mountain of evidence which contradicted their claims.(1)  The proponents of vaccines would cite studies published in the Journal of Pediatrics which appeared to refute any link between vaccines and autism, and even more vociferously deny any link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, ultimately ruining the career of Dr. Andrew Wakefield over his findings of a link between autism and MMR in a very heavy media smear campaign.  Well, we now have proof that the chief authors of the 2004 study, including executives within the CDC, which alleged no link between the MMR vaccine and autism, conspired to cook the data, in order to deny the link.  How do we know that?  One of the authors, Dr. William Thompson, of the Journal of Pediatrics 2004 research paper which alleged no link between MMR and autism has come forward and made a confession to Dr. Brian Hooker, a confession which we now have a recording of.

Here is a video summarizing some of the key findings:  http://vimeo.com/user5503203/review/103711143/91f7d3d4d8

In summary, here’s what we know:

Executives at the CDC, Dr. Frank Stefano, in particular,  knowingly excluded data from a key research paper which apparently refuted a link between autism and the MMR vaccine.  Dr. William Thompson has made a public statement admitting that his phone conversations were recorded, and has not denied anything which Dr. Hooker has leaked to the public about his confession.(2)

The data, had it been included in the final paper, indicated a 300% increase in autism amongst African American children. (3)

The CDC has sat on the evidence of a link between autism and the MMR vaccine for at least 10 years, and has continued to recommend the MMR vaccine for all children, injuring thousands in the process in their criminal negligence.

Questions everybody should be asking:

If the CDC cooked the data on this study, how can they be trusted with any suggestion they make, or have made?  What other studies are bogus?

Given the hysteria over Ebola and the fast tracking of an unproven Ebola vaccine, how can anybody put any faith in them to put forward honest information about the reality of the infectious disease?(4)  Remember this when talks about mandatory vaccination comes, because I believe the talk is going to be heavy come 2015.

There are websites which are attempting to minimize the significance of this story, trying to say that the data doesn’t mean what  people such as myself say that it means, and to them, I ask:  If this was such a non-issue, why would Dr. Thompson give emotional phone calls to Dr. Hooker and basically admit his “sins” in covering up this fact?  If it was merely a matter of excluding data in a very explainable way, why the undeniable tone of guilt?   Why would you say, “I’ve stopped lying.”

The fact is, the Cochrane Review, which is an organization dedicated to analyzing studies, smelled a rat when the original study was published back in 2004.  You can read about that here.

Where is the mainstream media coverage of this?  What is their agenda in NOT doing their job in reporting this study?  (Hint: the pharmaceutical industry pays for more advertising space than any other industry.)  Do you think it’s not newsworthy that we have proof that the CDC has covered up the fact that there is a link between the MMR vaccine and autism?  Do you think it’s not newsworthy,  that an executive at the CDC conspired with other authors to cook the data in an attempt to deny the link between the MMR and autism?  How many people would not be dealing autism right now had the CDC published the true data of the study?   Why are we paying taxes to support such an institution of lies and misery?

Personally, I don’t believe the CDC is going to be able to survive the end result of this story.  Their credibility has been waning for some time, and this information has the potential to completely sink them.  I hope it does.  If you value your health, help sink them by spreading this story.  They’re not your friend, they never have been.

52 COMMENTS

  1. a concerned parent

    Oh look, another snake oil salesman fake doctor / chiropractor with a confirmation bias trying to preach to his choir of idiots about stuff that none of you understand. Andrew Wakefield is a fraud and should be in jail for the damage that he and his followers have caused. Are you proud to be part of the movement that is bringing preventable diseases back? That will be your legacy. When the antivax movement finally dies, history will remember your kind as, at best idiots, and at worst, monsters. I will have to raise my child in a world that is less safe because of people like you. Thanks, ass.

    • who are you ” a concerned parent” to judge other peoples opinions and findings,, if you want to vaccinate your kids go a head and don’t forget to start with yourself first,,,, very ignorant and stupid….

      • There is no such thing as “Who are you to…” in discussions on matters of fact, since matters of fact are determined through evidence and reason, and not via the personhood of the one who puts forth an idea or argument. “Who are you to…?” is just an ad hominem argument, which along with its counterpart, argumentum ad verecundiam, are logical fallacies, and are veridically worthless. If someone says 2 + 2 = 4, you don’t ask them who they are to say that, you simply offer agreement. If someone says 2 + 2 = 9, you don’t ask them who they are to say it, you just offer disagreement. “Who are you to say this” is just rhetorical bullshit, and a calling card of people who do not understand how science actually works.

    • I have to raise a child with autism in this world now. I am saddened that you know nothing of the truth behind this epidemic of autism. Please, consider that there may be a link and that you may be wrong. Why would so many parents report a regression into autism after the MMR vaccine? Just because the media does not cover something, does not make it false. Please open up your eyes.

      • Hey Christi. Is your kid still alive? You should be thankful instead of a bitch

        • Wow. What a hateful reply. I’m sure Christi would rather her child be alive without autism if she had the chance to undo the damage caused by vaccines.

          Are we to believe that every antibiotic or prescription given to mankind has a laundry list of side effects but that vaccines have none? LOL. Sorry, we’re onto your crimes against humanity (and what’s most horrifying is that they’re using innocent, pure children).

          Read the insert to the TDAP vaccine and the list of possible problems associated with the vaccine. I’m sure if a doctor (who is supposed to FIRST DO NO HARM) allowed parents to read that insert, then the parents would at least take the time to do some research to make an INFORMED decision on behalf of their innocent child.

          Medicine has become a new religion where we’re not allowed to question anything. Well guess what? We’re questioning and we’re not stopping. Doctors are human beings like the rest of us and make mistakes like the rest of us.

          What’s extremely interesting is that these people who scream about how everyone must vaccinate are the same ones who claim we should all be able to choose what to do with our own bodies.

          We’re sick to death of all of you.

        • Let’s all hope you get a child with autism after the MMR vaccine so we can all tell you to be happy he/she is alive. Idiot!

    • Another concerned parent

      I think you missed the point here concerned parent. The CDC has withheld important data from you and lied about for 10 years and now it is public record. Trust the Cochran Review, it is where all doctors go to sort through the research mess. They have no bias. They take all the hundreds of studies published and sort through the good bad and ugly accounting for study strength and then give a recommendation based on all the available credible evidence. They don’t count antivax opinion, or otherwise. If they smell a rat, there is a rat. So if your calling out someone who just handed you pretty solid evidence to at least question your stance (are you even a fake doctor? – your words). What evidence will you accept to at least question your statement? I am not antivax BTW. I am a concerned parent as well. I don’t know everything but I don’t trust snakeoil salesmen either. The question is then, what does the writer if this post gain by sharing this info? Is there financial gain? I think not. Is there personal gain? Maybe. Is there the freedom to choose your medical care for your family. Sure. Nobody wants to anthrax, nobody wants autism either. You weigh the probability of each and make the best possible decision. Only military are routinely give the Anthrax vaccine BTW. Are you up on your vaccines? All of them? Have you had all of your boosters that are recommended every 5 to 7 years? Should we make sure every cab driver, bus driver, trucker, waitress and cook in the US are up to date or just children until high school? That is even assuming the CDC was being completely honest which is the heart of the article, they can’t be trusted for at least the last 10 years. They lied, plain and simple. Look it up. Look it up from multiple sources. Ibwould start by researching the Cochrane Review and find learn about thier process first. Just some thoughts.

      • They never get into the particulars of this “cover-up” do they. *sigh* The data that was tossed due to flawed methodology was from a grand total of FIVE CHILDREN!!! FIVE!! Also, how is it that this points to black kids being more susceptible since they are biologically IDENTICAL to kids of every other race on this earth? And Wakefield? Again, facts, court records. There are letters between him and a bunch of lawyers discussing what would be needed to discredit the MMR vaccine TWO YEARS before his so-called “studies” which he falsified the data for.

        Fact. Look it up.

        • And yet, Atomc Nixon, more Black children and adults suffer from sickle cell anaemia . . why is that then? More Basques have Onegative blood with antibodies. . Groups of people, whil biologically the same, have differences, and those differences could be the key to why some people are affected by a medication and others are not.

          • Just backing you up val

            This is true. I worked at a blood bank. It’s not out of this world to think the vaccine would effect certain ethnicities more than others.

    • Don’t even bother engaging with these idiots. They are probably hired by the illuminati families! Or work for CDC! This is all coming out now and they will get the death penalty soon

      Sorry, about your child. Even more sorry you have to deal with unconscious idiots!

    • The CDC is bought and paid for by big pharma. It’s sad that you don’t know any better. The only reason that everyone now thinks that Wakefield is a fraud, is because Big pharma used their billions of dollars, and influence, to threaten his life and career if he didn’t retract the paper. Do you not see how many other whistleblowers have come forward since then, acknowledging that everything he said was true? Let me sell you some swampland in Florida, because you’re obviously too naive to do the research yourself.

  2. A Educated Concerned Parent

    Oh, look! It’s a fear mongering, name calling, CDC sheep. Thanks to you, and the other sheep who blindly follow, diseases have made a comeback. If it wasn’t for the shedding of the virus in these vaccine, the ‘outbreaks’ they report about never would have occurred. All of the individuals who got it and spread it were vaccinated. Quit blaming unvaccinated people – they can’t give people a disease they don’t have! But, vaccinated people can because they carry and shed it after vaccination. It is you who is the monster!

    • Simple grammar.

      An* educated concerned parent….not very educated I see.

      • If the MMR vaccine is the sole cause for Autism, I don’t see how everyone who gets that vaccine wouldn’t have it? There are to me obviously some other things in particular children that are maybe triggered when they receive the injection. I feel like maybe some type of DNA testing like they are doing now for other medications would be advisable before the vaccine. I have 6 siblings and we have 24 children and 7 grandchildren amongst us, all vaccinated with no issues from it. I just feel like there is a better answer then no vaccines. My opinion, you are entitled to yours.

    • You are completely unconscious! Go back to sleep. Don’t trust the government as they work for corrupt banking families and are paid off. They don’t care about your kids! They only want to make everyone sick so they get richer with all the drugs you are on. Wake up! Our govt is corrupt and evil. You are cattle to them. This is all coming out now. Before you make yourself look anymore stupid I would suggest you hold off for a few months before babbling about what the corrupt media tells you! Guess what? The media is owned by the corrupt families

  3. concerned parent … what do you know about anything? or are you just an idiot troll? Accept the fact that not everyone wants mainstream medicine and especially mainstream medicine shoved down our throats. It is a waste of time debating the issues and facts with you because – well you are an idiot – you have not an ounce of common sense or rationality in your brain. You have been brainwashed and your are too lazy to do real homework. No one is saying you cannot get vaccines – get as many as you want. If you get them, you are purportedly protected – so stop caring whether I have mine or not. When the forced vax movement dies, the real monsters will finally be revealed. There is NEVER ANY EXCUSE in a moral society for denying informed consent rights … to do so is medical tyranny – as is a standardized one-size-fits-all government sanctioned and forced medicine. If this is what you want, you are a fascist pig. While the deaths and injuries from vaccines prove this medical practice is an abomination … vaccine safety is a serious issue but the real problem here is the legal and constitutional problem of civil rights, parental rights, religious freedom, healthcare freedom. In a moral and free society, “for the common good” does NOT trump individual rights.

  4. Hey Concerned Parent, If your child is vaccinated, then why are you worried? I bet you feel like the “ass” now that CDC scientists are coming forward admitting they covered up proof of the autism link. You also said the unvaccinated are bringing back preventable diseases……HA! Well don’t you feel like an idiot now that they are finding that the vaccinations themselves were making people contagious immediately after getting their shots…and VACCINATED people were getting it! If they’re getting it, then the vaccines do not work, do they? Wakefield wasn’t the fraud….the CDC was! They just ruined his life/career to bully him into retracting his statements. So now history will be looking back at YOU and your other sheep friends, saying “I can’t believe they played Russian Roulette with their children’s lives just because some corrupt corporation told them they were necessary and safe.” Then they will laugh and say, “They DID have internet back then, didn’t they? Couldn’t they read? Didn’t they know how to use Google to research it themselves?”

    • Look toward the Amish, no reported Autism that I have found researching. They also do not do vaccines. Think about that.

  5. If you have your kids vaccinated and you believe in it so much then it dosent matter what diseases are out there. Your kid is protected. Right?

  6. As someone who has GBS, which should be called Vaccine Induced Neurological Entropy, I agree with your article and disagree with ‘a concerned parent’ who is probably not a parent at all. Vaccines are dangerous, they are given to children without regard to their overall state of health and too much pseudo science has been used to justify them, while real studies are either discouraged or any non-standardized results are hidden or destroyed. If I had young children today they would not be vaccinated, the vaccines are toxic, they are dangerous and I still do not understand how the CDC can justify a 45% mercury content when it is considered so toxic that it requires a permit to be handled, and mercury thermometers are banned in the EU.

  7. What’s A Real Doctor? Western Allopathic Medicine is failed medicine. Natural Science was taken out medical schools to make DuPont and Rockefeller their next fortune in “synthetic chemical science and medicine” now known as “pharmaceutical drug medicine.” Medical Students do not study Biology 101, Health, Nutrition, Toxicology, Immunology, or the long term use of food supplements for health. Medical students do not study how vaccines are made, especially the Adjuvants. The Pharmaceutical companies share profits with MD’s. After 75 years…..Western Medicine cannot safely or effectively or gently reverse cancer or any life threatening or chronic disease. Western Medicine ranks 34th for effective medicine, globally. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ireland, and India have successfully sued Bill Gates and the Who.org for 47 thousand paralyzed children from the Sulk Polio vaccine and impairments and young girls deaths from Gardasil. France is number one in medicine and they have linked autism and cancer to vaccines, along with a handful of other countries.
    The Congressional Health Oversight Committee is demanding the basic bottom line study vaccinated vs unvaccinated to be done by 3 independent researchers. Until, this study is completed all CDC studies are null and void. Currently, pro-vaxxers do not have any studies to refer to or boast about. Dr.Boyle is caught over and over again lying to the Health Oversight Committee. Look on YouTube. And, none of the studies have been turned over to the Congressional Committee as promised. Vaccines have never been tested for safety and effectiveness, no double blind peer reviewed studies exist either. Nor do they check for cancerous cells. Why? Because they don’t want fingers of blame pointing their way. Pro Vaxxer might spend some time studying how the immune system works and understand the “shedding process” that happens after vaccinations are given that actually spread the infectious disease. 78 children were previously vaccinated in the Disneyland Outbreak. This is all FEAR Mongering to keep their trillion dollar industry. Chemo therapy is marketed the same way and is poison with a 700% mark up. It kills all cells except for Cancer Adult Stem Cells. Duh, and they keep doing it over and over again.

    • Bullshit. There is no such thing as “allopathic” or “natural” medicine. There is only science-based medicine. Anything that does not follow the Scientific Method is not science, and is therefore not medicine. Science-based medicine has given us everything from proper hygiene and sterilization of materials to the understanding of germs, to aspirin to open-heart surgery to transplants to LASIK and countless other advancements which have doubled our lifespans and improved the quality of life. Saying that science-based medicine has “failed” is just fucking stupid.

      • Allopathic medicine sure does exist! That is the type of medicine you study when you get an MD.

        • Yeah, in that sense the word “allopathic” means “The only kind of”

      • Luigi you are an incredible ignorant person – you obviously just believe everthing you hear on mainstream media and don’t ever bother to read up or research anything further. More people have been cured from diseases with natural medicines such as herbs and good diets, etc., exposure to sunshine, homeopathic medicines (which defy science, but work wonderfully well) and ayurvedic medicine, acupuncture etc. than have ever been CURED by allopathic medicine. I pity you if you don’t ever try a healthy alternative – your days are doomed!

        • **Kathie: “Luigi you are an incredible ignorant person…”**

          Okay. Let’s test that.

          Explain to me how the Scientific Method works, and the criteria that distinguish scientific ideas from non-scientific, or pseudoscientific ideas. Then explain how anti-vaxxer ideas pass the criteria for the former, and not the latter. If I’m in the ignorant one, and you’re the knowledgeable one, then you should be able to explain this easily.

          **Kathie: “…you obviously just believe everthing you hear on mainstream media

          That’s an assumption on your part. The truth is that I reject anti-vaxxer pseudoscience because I’ve actually studied the Scientific Method, and how it distinguishes scientific ideas from non-scientific ones, and regularly read material from pro-science sources like Sketpic magazine and Skeptical Inquirer, which is hardly “mainstream”.

          **Kathie: “…and don’t ever bother to read up or research anything further.”**

          An assumption on your part that bears no relationship to reality, and for which you provide zero evidence.

          In fact, I’ve harbored a strong interest in science my entire life, and I’ve read extensively on it, with a strong emphasis on pseudoscience, critical thinking, the Scientific Method, logical fallacies, etc. I’ve read most of the books of Skeptics Society founder and Skeptic magazine publisher Dr. Michael Shermer, Univeristy of Maryland Professor Robert L. Park, James Randi, etc.

          These comments of yours are merely your way of attacking those who don’t share you viewpoint. They have nothing to do with the truth of whether their ignorance or their research habits.

          **Kathie: “More people have been cured from diseases with natural medicines such as herbs and good diets, etc., exposure to sunshine, homeopathic medicines (which defy science, but work wonderfully well) and ayurvedic medicine, acupuncture etc. than have ever been CURED by allopathic medicine. ”**

          Bullshit.

          If this is true, then provide a reliable source that supports it.

          Unless you can do this, then you’re simply a liar, plain and simple.

      • The term “allopathy” was invented by German physician Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843). He conjoined allos “opposite” and pathos “suffering” as a referent to harsh medical practices of his era which included bleeding, purging, vomiting and the administration of highly toxic drugs like mercury. This term is referred to what is more commonly known as standard mainstream medicine although I believe any medical doctor would prefer not to be called that. Medicine and doctors have always been based on qualified guessing based on what “scientific evidence” is available at the time, the problem is that we know pharmaceutical companies have hijacked the medical institution and provide them with their own science data which is not always showing the whole picture. This is true in the way pharmaceutical companies are responsible for their own medical trials to bring new drugs to the market, there is also a system in place by FDA to whom the pharmaceutical companies pay large “fees” in order to be given priority for approval. All “legal”. The data is manipulated by conducting several trial groups and cherry picking the best results that they want to submit to FDA, e.g you have 10 groups of 1000 subjects each, only 1 group shows positive effect of the drug with little to no side-effects and the rest will show negative effect and serious side effects, they will not have to disclose all the groups data but only the 1 they choose to submit to FDA. So what you basically have is a restaurant who conduct their own health and safety checks without scrutiny from the government.

  8. Try working with some Autistic kids sometime. Try discovering the scope of the problem, just how many kids are like this now, and how rapidly it’s grown. It could have happened to you.
    By the fervor your post, I wouldn’t be surprised if you were a hired troll. If not, you are afraid of the wrong thing, and should seek more information before judging.

  9. The Who.org is behind the forced vaccine laws in Congress, State, and Heads of Congress. Why? According to their Sales Promotion PDF is to guarantee a trillion dollar industry to secure profits for medical associates sponsoring their vaccines. And, by focusing on middle income families, globally. Hopefully, Putin will not take advantage of this opportunity to Genocide of the American People. He has so far thrown out our vaccines and GMO and plans to make Russia the Organic Capitol of the world. However, other known enemies of the USA are being marketed by Who.org. 85% of vaccines are made outside the USA and shipped back in by China, Philippines, Taiwan where human and animal abuse is condoned. What about quality controls for sourcing, storage, and shipping conditions? Contamination is a huge killer of infants, toddlers, and children. I closed down my local clinic because the frig where the vaccines were stored was sprung and the vaccines boxed showed expired for 3 years. I was suppose to inject my premature infant with these vaccines. Korea is making natural vaccines out of gen sing. The leader of this country has a missile pointed at our heads and had his own Uncle torn apart by hungry murderous dogs. Bill Gates is loosing in vaccine courts in India for 47 thousand paralyzed children from the Sulk Polio Vaccine. Spain, Italy, France, Japan, and Ireland have launched an investigation into Gardasil impairments and deaths.

  10. The debate is not “over”, as indicated by the fact that the conversation is ongoing, in venues like this one and elsewhere in the scientific community and the public. In science, no debate is ever “over”, since all of the knowledge in science, even the most rigorously confirmed facts, is still provisional, so when someone makes rhetorical remarks like “the debate is over”, it merely serves as a red flag that they don’t really understand how science and the Scientific Method works.

    The next clue is that the “proof” is not a news story in a reputable media source, or a published report in a reputable peer review science journal, but a website on homesteading, by a poster who cites a video on Vimeo (a site on which anyone can post a video) starring Andrew Wakefield, the disgraced former researcher who was found to have subjected children to unnecessary invasive medical procedures, was found by a medical counsel tribunal guilty of four counts of dishonesty and 12 counts involving the abuse of developmentally challenged children, who planned to launch a venture on the back of an MMR vaccination scare that would profit from new medical tests and “litigation driven testing”, who was barred from practicing medicine in the UK, and whose fraud led to a decline in vaccination rates in the United States, United Kingdom and Ireland, and a corresponding rise in measles and mumps-related illness and deaths.

    Putting Wakefield aside, the video appears to be centered around a “confession” by CDC researcher William Thompson, who admits to omitting data from a 2004 paper, whose publication did not follow proper final study protocols.

    What got lost in the brouhaha over Dr. Thompson’s “confession,” is the question of whether the collected data actually proved that the MMR vaccine produces a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American boys. Did it?

    No, it did not.

    As the CDC noted, the authors of that study suggested that the most likely explanation for the moderate correlation between autism and vaccination in young children was the existence of immunization requirements for autistic children enrolled in special education preschool programs

    There’s no biologically plausible reason why there would be an effect observed in African-Americans but no other race and, more specifically than that, in African-American males, nor is there a biologically plausible mechanism to account for these observations, suggesting that they’re probably spurious. There are multiple other studies, many much larger than this one, that failed to find a correlation between MMR and autism. It bears mentioning that Thompson has clarified “I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives,” Thompson said in his statement. “I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race.”

    I previously including several links to citations for the above statements, but my comment did not go through, presumably because of them. However, all of the above can be confirmed via a Google search, which will direct one to sources such as CNN, The Guardian, The Times, Snopes, etc.

  11. To be clear, any of you sitting on the fence regarding vaccine safety, the trolls here are paid shills from Pharma meant to influence you into their way of thinking.

  12. (NOTE: The following post was previously submitted but not accepted, perhaps because of the copious links to supporting sources like CNN, The Guardian, The Times, The New England Journal of Medicine. They have been removed, but notes appear in the places where they were previously included, and can be provided on request, though a Google search can corroborate the material herein.)

    The debate is not “over”, as indicated by the fact that the conversation is ongoing, in venues like this one and elsewhere in the scientific community and the public. In science, no debate is ever “over”, since all of the knowledge in science, even the most rigorously confirmed facts, is still provisional, so when someone makes rhetorical remarks like “the debate is over”, it merely serves as a red flag that they don’t really understand how science and the Scientific Method works.

    The next clue is that the “proof” is not a news story in a reputable media source, or a published report in a reputable peer review science journal, but a website on homesteading, by a poster who cites a video on Vimeo (a site on which anyone can post a video) starring Andrew Wakefield, the disgraced former researcher who was found to have subjected children to unnecessary invasive medical procedures (Link provided on request), was found by a medical counsel tribunal guilty of four counts of dishonesty and 12 counts involving the abuse of developmentally challenged children (Link provided on request), who planned to launch a venture on the back of an MMR vaccination scare that would profit from new medical tests and “litigation driven testing” (Link provided on request), who was barred from practicing medicine in the UK (Link provided on request), and whose fraud led to a decline in vaccination rates in the United States, United Kingdom and Ireland, and a corresponding rise in measles and mumps-related illness and deaths (Link provided on request).

    Putting Wakefield aside, the video appears to be centered around a “confession” by CDC researcher William Thompson, who admits to omitting data from a 2004 paper, whose publication did not follow proper final study protocols.

    What got lost in the brouhaha over Dr. Thompson’s “confession,” is the question of whether the collected data actually proved that the MMR vaccine produces a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American boys. Did it?

    No, it did not.

    As the CDC noted, the authors of that study suggested that the most likely explanation for the moderate correlation between autism and vaccination in young children was the existence of immunization requirements for autistic children enrolled in special education preschool programs

    There’s no biologically plausible reason why there would be an effect observed in African-Americans but no other race and, more specifically than that, in African-American males, nor is there a biologically plausible mechanism to account for these observations, suggesting that they’re probably spurious. There are multiple other studies, many much larger than this one, that failed to find a correlation between MMR and autism. (Link provided on request) It bears mentioning that Thompson has clarified “I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives,” Thompson said in his statement. “I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race.” (Link provided on request)

    • I have approved all comments on this thread!

    • If I remember correctly, Brian Hooker was debunked years ago.

  13. So I take it that those of you claiming conspiracy behind compulsory vaccination don’t believe vaccines work? Do you think that the huge drops in deaths from measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, pertusiss, polio, smallpox, hepatitis b, etc. are just lies fabricated for some nefarious purpose? Because if they do work, then a 1 in 88 chance of autism is, as a matter of public health policy, an acceptable cost of preventing literally millions of deaths from those infectious diseases. For all of human history our cities and socities have been periodically laid low by disease running rampant, so I’m a bit incredulous that anyone who actually understands the dire consequences of epidemic would be willing to accept it.
    Also, autism tends to become diagnosable around the same time childhood vaccines are administered, so proving causation rather than mere correlation is a high hurdle. And none of the sources quoted in this article or the comments get near clearing it.

    • If they work or not, we have a right to say no.

  14. Okay so lookie here. You claim to say that vaccines can cause autism but you don’t even state the science behind it, but just accuse the CDC of covering up information about a supposed connection of the vaccine and autism. Also, I highly doubt that you even understand how autism works. Or vaccines. There’s no proof that you are giving. And until you can give me proof, I’m shutting you out.

    And even if it does cause autism in a select few, I sound really awful but you need to still administer the vaccine. The life of one does not outweigh the lives of many.

    • Your rights end where mine begin. Keep your needles away from me and my family, please!

  15. […] The debate is over: The MMR vaccine can cause Autism, and the CDC is engaged in a criminal conspirac… By DrBuckley Well, we now have proof that the chief authors of the 2004 study, including executives within the CDC, which alleged no link between the MMR vaccine and autism, conspired to cook the data, in order to deny the link.  How do we know that?  One of the authors, Dr. William Thompson, of the Journal of Pediatrics 2004 research paper which alleged no link between MMR and autism has come forward and made a confession to Dr. Brian Hooker, a confession which we now have a recording of. In summary, here’s what we know: Executives at the CDC, Dr. Frank Stefano, in particular,  knowingly excluded data from a key research paper which apparently refuted a link between autism and the MMR vaccine.  Dr. William Thompson has made a public statement admitting that his phone conversations were recorded, and has not denied anything which Dr. Hooker has leaked to the public about his confession.(2) The data, had it been included in the final paper, indicated a 300% increase in autism amongst African American children. (3) The CDC has sat on the evidence of a link between autism and the MMR vaccine for at least 10 years, and has continued to recommend the MMR vaccine for all children, injuring thousands in the process in their criminal negligence. […]

  16. Not only Autism, my sister has encephalitis now because of this vaccine…. and she has seizures periodically because of this.

    • My heart breaks for her!

  17. You know someone’s trying to pull a con when they remove all hints of the age of the webpage, even in the comments. (In case this comment is visible in the future, today is Mar 16, 2017 and at this moment in the NCAA March Madness, North Carolina-Wilmington Seahawks are up 26 to 14 over Virginia Cavaliers)

    More signs of a premeditated con: Instead of linking to the ignored study, this article says that Guy 1 recorded Guy 2 and Guy 2 was involved in a paper with Guy 3, and Guy 1 says that Guy 2 says that Guy 3 ignored a study that proves a link between vaccines and autism. As proof, this article provides a link to a video by a disgraced doctor that spends most of its time tainting all CDC research with some immoral medical experiments in the past. In that video, momentary snippets of audio supposedly of Guy 2 seem to imply he does indeed feel bad about something, but he never actually says what it is. Not compelling in any way. Where is the link to the ignored study? Where are the quotes from Guy 3 explaining why he ignored the ignored study?

    • So my site is a con because it doesn’t show the age of the site? I am confused. Dr. Buckley who wrote the article is a Dr. who has helped many people heal very extreme issues. He is my personal Dr. Definitely not a fraud.

      Define “disgraced”? I think you have not researched Wakefield in depth if you really think this.

LEAVE A REPLY